TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive415% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-58  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Jimny_ADH
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 03:05
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 181
2-Core 354
106% 203 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,084
109% 886 Pts
64-Core 1,560
96% 1,560 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 159C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 3912 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 156
Parallax 142
122% 150 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 118
Splatting 96.7
109% 140 fps
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2476 3275 3406 865 755 754 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
415% Outstanding
Read 3,047
Write 3,734
Mixed 2,865
SusWrite 1,922
652% 2,892 MB/s
4K Read 85.6
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 121
394% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,144
868% 1175 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑
This bench: 415%
 Great: 392%
Nvme Lexar SSD NM620 1TB
937GB free
Firmware: 12544 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1961 2286 2339 2081 1280 1250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 2,562
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 1,866
464% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 103
352% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,442
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 606
612% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑
This bench: 359%
 Great: 354%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR4800S564L40S/16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 57
MC Mixed 53.9
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 27.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 144%
 Great: 156%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 165 15.5" 1280 720 AUOE2A7
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-58 Builds (Compare 4,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-58

CPU
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples1,864x
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples1,145x
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples533x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples1,105x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples569x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples557x
SSD
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBNvmeBench 331%, 3,976 samples1,928x
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBNvmeBench 407%, 6,767 samples523x
SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00B07 512GBNvmeBench 303%, 1,542 samples423x
RAM
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 21,689 samples715x
ACR32D4S2S1MF-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 74%, 519 samples283x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples275x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback