HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F5
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220319
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 00:49
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 38.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 236
65% 128 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 594
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 88F5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 4.2
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 4.7
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme MTFDHBA512TDV-1AZ1AABHA 512GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0032 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 566 483 447 459 387 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1239
Write 818
Mixed 984
SusWrite 432
194% 868 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 36.3
119% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 576
438% 581 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 139%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 13.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 7.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 19 144 16" 1280 720 BOE0AAD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx Builds (Compare 2,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback