PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B360M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180426 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 30 '24 at 23:38 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 6510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
118%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 993 558 546 540 525 518 MB/s
|
227%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
87GB free
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 77 72 71 70 70 MB/s
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 88 105 133 139 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.4%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 56 | 50 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0B77 T24D590 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 311x |
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 234x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 176x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 141x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $378 |