Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B360M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 23:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 251
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 811
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 32.4
26% 34.9 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 23.2
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 6510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 214
Parallax 151
126% 173 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 135
Splatting 115
116% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 993 558 546 540 525 518 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,266
Write 1,823
Mixed 1,427
SusWrite 613
341% 1,533 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 62.2
202% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 780
590% 800 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 227%
Great: 435%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
87GB free
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 77 72 71 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 417
Write 225
Mixed 117
SusWrite 78.5
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 8.4
55% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 23.9
33% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 88 105 133 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 144
Write 137
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 107
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 50 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0B77 T24D590
Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback