Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 333%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics298% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive462% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 23:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 98.3
1-Core 195
2-Core 355
117% 216 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1,372
124% 1,045 Pts
64-Core 1,876
116% 1,876 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$958
Zotac(19DA 2688) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 431
Parallax 496
368% 460 fps
MRender 543
Gravity 363
Splatting 261
304% 389 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 298%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3721 2075 2096 2135 2025 2105 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
462% Outstanding
Read 3,173
Write 3,372
Mixed 3,522
SusWrite 2,359
701% 3,107 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 114
393% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,745
DQ Write 1,376
DQ Mixed 1575
1,175% 1,566 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 462%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3636F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
197% Outstanding
MC Read 76.1
MC Write 67.4
MC Mixed 71.5
205% 71.7 GB/s
SC Read 56.7
SC Write 62.2
SC Mixed 61.3
172% 60.1 GB/s
Latency 43.7
92% 43.7 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 197%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 66: 0P 4R 10G 16B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
66% 30% 101 559 469 240 27" 2560 1440 DELA208 DELL AW2723DF
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback