Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 247%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics266% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 22:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 322
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1136
106% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,983
123% 1,983 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
Zotac(19DA 4702) ≥ 4GB;
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
266% Outstanding
Lighting 416
Reflection 398
Parallax 476
339% 430 fps
MRender 420
Gravity 303
Splatting 216
245% 313 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 266%
Great: 314%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 79 78 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 436
Write 74.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 78.7
39% 178 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 22.7
98% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 103
83% 119 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 26
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 27" 1280 720 MSI9CA9 MSI G27C4X
Typical A520M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback