MSI MS-17E5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GL75 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-17E5  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 20:18
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 207
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 426
47% 371 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 129A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.87 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 12.5
8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 267 255 256 283 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 470
Write 233
Mixed 363
SusWrite 278
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 21
77% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 240
215% 336 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 141%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
836GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 404 394 399 373 380 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 404
Write 348
Mixed 352
SusWrite 391
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 20.9
79% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 314
240% 326 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2400C16S4 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 7 60 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO429D
Typical MS-17E5 Builds (Compare 615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback