TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 18:19
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 225
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 663
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 882
55% 882 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 77%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 68.2
58% 71.4 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 67.4
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 57.5%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 1559 87 86 1344 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,677
Write 2,370
Mixed 2,017
SusWrite 664
380% 1,682 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 64.5
210% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 649
474% 628 MB/s
Poor: 117% ↑
This bench: 201%
 Great: 417%
Ldlc F7 PLUS 3D NAND 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 411 410 411 412 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 417
Mixed 380
SusWrite 411
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 25.1
117% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 39.7
96% 196 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 91.9%
 Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 206 208 204 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 137
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 203
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 38.3%
 Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 35% 26 214 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 IVM615C PL2470H
History: Score 23: 0P 2R 3G 4B | Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples486x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD  $190Bench 84%, 294,959 samples161x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples155x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples89x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples88x
SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples36x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples52x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback