Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 229%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 17:15
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$290
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 212
2-Core 418
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1527
140% 1,174 Pts
64-Core 2,875
178% 2,875 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 273
Parallax 318
241% 296 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 252
Splatting 189
204% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 203%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 4TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 392 391 399 401 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 667
Write 380
Mixed 400
SusWrite 335
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 22.6
78% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 419
280% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 337%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$306
914GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 485 487 488 488 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 486
Mixed 439
SusWrite 461
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 60
207% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
452GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2045 1740 1739 1742 1743 1740 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,027
Write 2,368
Mixed 1,884
SusWrite 1,791
455% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 83.7
316% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 2,074
DQ Write 1,648
DQ Mixed 1,832
1,379% 1,851 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 370%
Great: 347%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
626GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2009 1734 1733 1733 1735 1735 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 2312
Mixed 1,886
SusWrite 1,780
452% 2,001 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 83.8
316% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 2,074
DQ Write 1,660
DQ Mixed 1,847
1,388% 1,860 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 369%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 28.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback