Acer Predator G6-710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G6-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G6-710
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 17:02
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 642
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Sapphire(174B 1070) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 89.8
Reflection 103
Parallax 91.8
73% 94.9 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 90.7
73% 89.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T871202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 104 89 98 91 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 33.8
Write 432
Mixed 128
SusWrite 99.2
40% 173 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 29.2
108% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 128
102% 140 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
520GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 145 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 107
SusWrite 148
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 149 156 165 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 178
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 160
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.2
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical Predator G6-710 Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Acer Predator G6-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback