MSI MS-158N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 C7VE
MotherboardMSI MS-158N  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 16:34
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 326
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 1,015
100% 821 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13DD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 102
Parallax 120
113% 120 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 85.9
90% 114 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
AMD Radeon 660M
MSI(1462 13DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 35.8
16% 27.4 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 21.4
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,094
Write 2,202
Mixed 1671
444% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 72.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 88.3
307% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 957
DQ Mixed 1,123
842% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL PSD516G480081S 24GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 32.5
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 25.2
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 24.3" 1920 1009 TRG24B0 F23H75
Typical MS-158N Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI MS-158N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback