Dell XPS 8930

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8930  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DF42J
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 15:56
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 252
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 758
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.9% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 65.9
56% 68.5 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 64.3
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,923
Write 1,274
Mixed 917
302% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 49.3
163% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 252
218% 336 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 294%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
83GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 387
Mixed 298
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 13.4
68% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 95.6
DQ Mixed 34
46% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 58%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
159GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC70
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 20
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
8GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37
Write 34.5
Mixed 32.8
44% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.3
211% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%
USB DISK 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 50.3
Mixed 34.8
70% 66 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
79% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 35%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
502GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 55.7
106% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 53%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB
61GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.7
Write 67.2
Mixed 40
74% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0A4 DELL U2414H
Typical XPS 8930 Builds (Compare 6,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 8930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback