Lenovo INVALID

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo INVALID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 03:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300HF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 409
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A41) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 12.1
11% 12.3 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 11.3
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 251 274 204 151 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 391
Mixed 447
SusWrite 255
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 40.2
128% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 599
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 483
363% 491 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 112%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
486GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 163
Write 120
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 86.8
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-S16G-3200 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical INVALID Builds (Compare 2,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo INVALID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback