Lenovo 82XV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82XV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 02:36
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 59
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 195
61% 113 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 644
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3C90) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
9.5% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 10.7
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 13.3
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKCD512TFK 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1003V5LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1488 1898 1686 1327 786 525 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 871
Write 1,637
Mixed 1,013
SusWrite 1,285
273% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 27.6
132% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 665
480% 625 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 179%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 31 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AE3
Typical 82XV Builds (Compare 1,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback