MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 02:16
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 176
2-Core 350
109% 205 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,078
105% 864 Pts
64-Core 1,544
96% 1,544 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 159
Parallax 159
136% 161 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 132
Splatting 111
112% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2015 1871 1830 1902 1856 1870 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2624
Write 2,430
Mixed 2,424
SusWrite 1,890
527% 2,342 MB/s
4K Read 76.2
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 99.4
334% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 1,023
DQ Mixed 1,149
866% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 376%
Great: 435%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
202GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 471 466 465 466 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 470
Mixed 331
SusWrite 468
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 45.7
169% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 180
159% 230 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
214GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 419 414 412 399 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 413
Mixed 351
SusWrite 411
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 38.4
144% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 190
182% 285 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
192GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 225 120 124 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 420
Mixed 362
SusWrite 186
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 19.4
108% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 28.8
85% 179 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
386GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 496 496 496 496 497 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 467
Mixed 415
SusWrite 496
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 64.1
221% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 374
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
3TB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 175 177 175 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 176
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 176
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 42% 26 51 16 60 28.6" 2560 1417 SAM1015 LU28R55
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback