MSI MEG Z790 ACE MAX (MS-7D86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 226%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics141% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive385% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D86
MotherboardMSI MEG Z790 ACE MAX (MS-7D86)  (all builds)
Memory38.6 GB free of 48 GB
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231110
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 02:06
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$490
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 239
2-Core 478
136% 267 Pts
4-Core 955
8-Core 1,727
161% 1341 Pts
64-Core 3,722
230% 3,722 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 131%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
141% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 192
Parallax 223
142% 197 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 212
Splatting 170
167% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 141%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
592GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1904 2387 1457 1244 1299 1488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 2453
Write 2,239
Mixed 1,487
SusWrite 1,630
438% 1,952 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 97.9
345% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 2,036
DQ Write 1,595
DQ Mixed 1,775
1,339% 1,802 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 385%
Great: 410%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
123GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,545
Write 2,918
Mixed 2,650
606% 2,704 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 108
353% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 2,146
DQ Write 1,679
DQ Mixed 1,897
1,423% 1,907 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Pc611 NVMe SK hynix 512GB
473GB free
Firmware: 11000111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2206 2157 831 753 727 702 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 1,805
Mixed 1,416
SusWrite 1,229
317% 1,396 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 78.2
280% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,520
DQ Mixed 1711
1,262% 1,661 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 279%
Great: 273%
Micron 2200S NVMe 512GB
410GB free
Firmware: 22001070 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 1165 1156 1202 1168 1155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 884
Mixed 918
SusWrite 1,176
249% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 58.6
197% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 825
DQ Mixed 888
649% 844 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 229%
Great: 215%
HBS3A1912A7E6B1 120GB
107GB free
Firmware: M6102100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 146 109 108 109 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 453
Write 69.8
Mixed 321
SusWrite 137
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 44.5
151% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 251
197% 272 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH48GX5M2B7200C36 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7200 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
201% Outstanding
MC Read 90.4
MC Write 74.3
MC Mixed 75
228% 79.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 51.8
SC Mixed 32.4
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 201%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 1R 1G 16B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 47% 53 202 28 360 24.5" 1680 1050 VSCE53B XG251G
History: Score 55: 0P 4R 7G 14B | Score 24: 0P 3R 2G 3B | Score 24: 0P 1R 1G 16B
Typical MEG Z790 ACE MAX (MS-7D86) Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 460%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z790 ACE MAX (MS-7D86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback