Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502VJ
Memory48.2 GB free of 56 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 00:47
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 70.6
1-Core 201
2-Core 382
112% 218 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,080
108% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,742
108% 1,742 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 3158) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.6% Above average
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 72.4
64% 73.7 fps
MRender 47.9
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 55.3
45% 55 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51060A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 1595 1841 1670 2027 1754 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 3,444
Write 1,870
Mixed 2,213
SusWrite 1,777
518% 2,326 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 88.5
291% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1005
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 785
565% 744 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 369%
Great: 661%
Nvme SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 51060A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2453 2518 2512 2515 2521 2537 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 3,488
Write 2,502
Mixed 2,196
SusWrite 2,509
598% 2,674 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 90.9
298% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1036
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 804
583% 770 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 419%
Great: 661%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT48G56C46S5.M16B1 Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 39GB
5600, 4800 MHz
32767, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 38.5
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Typical ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback