Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 00:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 235
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 760
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 146
Parallax 214
113% 166 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 158
Splatting 97.4
100% 126 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 443 447 440 405 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 462
Write 442
Mixed 401
SusWrite 423
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 24.8
78% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 324
239% 315 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 20
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 24" 1280 720 AUS24C2 VG248
Typical Default string Builds (Compare 948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback