HP All-in-One 22-dd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One 22-dd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86F0
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 23:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4025
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 30.3
1-Core 55
2-Core 98.3
34% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 88.6
8-Core 81.8
12% 85.2 Pts
64-Core 91
6% 91 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 86F0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.2
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CVB-8D128-HP 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 146 147 149 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 359
Write 149
Mixed 195
SusWrite 147
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 23.9
83% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 147
112% 151 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SKHynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 294
14% 294 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 38 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN402F HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One 22-dd0xxx Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 22-dd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback