Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 21:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 129
56% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 187
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 108F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.2
5% 2.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 29 72 4.1 17 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 354
Write 297
Mixed 193
SusWrite 58.3
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 12.2
48% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 79.4
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 3.2
24% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0505
Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback