Asus PRIME H410M-K R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H410M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210715
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 21:43
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100-$94 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 90.8 1-Core 127 2-Core 249 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 656 67% 542 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.77 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.4 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R024F Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 364 Write 370 Mixed 323 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 35.5 128% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 82.9 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 134 120% 172 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 45GB free Firmware: SD22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 83 84 81 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 78.8 Write 77.1 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 81.7 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 65%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$41 9,464 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 53GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 81 83 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 79.6 Write 71.2 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 82.2 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 1x8GB 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.3% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	72.3"	1280 720	SNY0902 SONY TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H410M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	154x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	117x
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	63x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	22x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 8,345 samples	25x
STK4U2400D17081C 2x8GBCrucialBench 74%, 196 samples	16x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16