Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime18.7 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 17:26
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 702
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 184
Parallax 165
113% 162 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 167
Splatting 126
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 311 313 115 142 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 437
Write 388
Mixed 337
SusWrite 220
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 34.6
133% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 304
215% 270 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 95%
PNY CS2130 4TB SSD
6.5TB free
Firmware: CS303150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 1050 1349 1354 1074 989 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1172
Write 1,303
Mixed 1,208
SusWrite 1,143
273% 1,207 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65.4
216% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 952
710% 946 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 226%
Great: 388%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
44GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 180 180 183 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69% Good
Read 445
Write 189
Mixed 221
SusWrite 180
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 15.1
104% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 29.7
75% 162 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
398GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 87.9
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 91.2
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
365GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 81.5
Write 87.4
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 88.2
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 189 8 144 27" 2560 1377 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback