TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 17:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 780
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 1034
64% 1034 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 80.7%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
MSI(1462 3790)
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 88.4
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 75
72% 82.6 fps
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 41.8
51% 60.1 fps
Poor: 62% Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 214 260 258 177 260 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 301
Write 310
Mixed 309
SusWrite 243
66% 291 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 47.4
152% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 229
189% 270 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
345GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 124
Write 89.1
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 100
62% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 64.5%
 Great: 107%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
543GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 103 102 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 71
SusWrite 104
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 61.9%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.9% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 67.9%
 Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 9 60 27.9" 2560 1440 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples1,447x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples308x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples283x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples235x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples234x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples202x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $148Bench 297%, 331,647 samples190x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples190x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples179x
RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples205x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples143x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples134x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback