PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds) |
Memory | 0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170718 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 29 '24 at 17:08 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 7.5 7.3 3.5 11 4.9 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
769GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 55 57 57 53 69 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 67 | 57 | 60 | 23.7" | 1280 720 | XMI23C3 Mi Monitor |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 69x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 65x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 81x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |