Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 16:01
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 257
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 742
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.7% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 63.9
55% 67 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 63
52% 62.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,906
Write 1,426
Mixed 531
283% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 44.7
166% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1068
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 734
607% 877 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WDC PC SA530 SDASN8Y-256G-1006 256GB
49GB free
Firmware: 40211006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 466
Mixed 334
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 43.5
147% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 252
215% 316 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 87%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
140GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.7
Write 60
Mixed 43.5
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 35%
 8GB
8GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.1
Write 6.7
Mixed 4.2
11% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.9% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 30.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 32.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32E0 ASUS VG32VQ1B
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $523
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback