Asrock B550M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive2.98% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230510
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 15:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 57.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 186
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 912
96% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21905.1001
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.63% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 23
6% 15.2 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 19.3
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.63%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD R5SL960G 960GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.4 218 4.3 3.8 5.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
2.98% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 96.1
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 39.4
8% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.1
2% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 0P 4R 5G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 39% 57 65 47 144 23.8" 1920 1080 LHCFFFF P24H2G
Typical B550M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $561
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback