Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140210
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 12:58
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 183 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 479 50% 399 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3741) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.4 Reflection 109 Parallax 70.6 58% 83.6 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 65.7 55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 766GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 35 59 66 49 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 396 Write 238 Mixed 224 SusWrite 75.3 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 15 58% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 94.4 DQ Mixed 32.5 33% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 58%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB 12,047 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 196GB free Firmware: 1000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 410 397 317 267 279 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 397 Write 354 Mixed 257 SusWrite 343 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 29.7 117% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 236 204% 304 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	36% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	55	60	27"	1280 720	SAM7079 LC27G5xT

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	415x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	351x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	218x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	216x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16