Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5404VA_K5404VA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5404VA_K5404VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K5404VA
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231004
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 11:56
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 49.3
1-Core 201
2-Core 402
108% 218 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 813
93% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,434
89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 17D3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 32.8
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 23.3
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
559GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,885
Write 3,710
Mixed 3,245
737% 3,280 MB/s
4K Read 82.5
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 111
377% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 1043
DQ Mixed 1,163
861% 1,137 MB/s
Poor: 252% Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 48.2
142% 49.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 50.6
SC Mixed 21.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 128%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 14.5" 1280 720 SDC416D
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5404VA_K5404VA Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K5404VA_K5404VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback