Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160311
Uptime	12.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 10:11
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6098P 6,133 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 62.9 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 165 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 245 35% 258 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake) 16,316 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 93 83 77 80 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 391 Write 362 Mixed 271 SusWrite 97.6 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 35.5 117% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 293 228% 314 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 114%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 55GB free Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 82 85 80 84 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 332 Write 95.5 Mixed 141 SusWrite 77.9 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 11.2 45% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 36.6 DQ Mixed 28.6 33% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB 5,345 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	17"	1280 720	BNQ8013 BenQ BL702

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B150M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 887 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	244x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	131x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	119x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	89x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	76x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	22x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	19x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16