Gigabyte GA-G5 ME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 ME  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 07:47
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 45.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 341
88% 179 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,003
102% 824 Pts
64-Core 1368
85% 1368 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 866D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 512GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 314 316 316 315 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,028
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 314
223% 988 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 60.9
260% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 417
490% 856 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 187%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905663-007.A00G 9905630-031.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 19
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 13.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 9 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical GA-G5 ME Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 ME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback