Metabox Alpha NH58JNP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMetabox Alpha NH58JNP  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NH5xJNX
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 05:15
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 194
2-Core 384
117% 222 Pts
4-Core 737
8-Core 1,224
120% 980 Pts
64-Core 2088
129% 2088 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Clevo(1558 5163) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 0.3
1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 83 84 81 83 750 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 1,858
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 322
259% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 84.7
314% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 1488
DQ Mixed 1,306
983% 1,298 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 217%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 36.2
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 30.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 105%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 0P 2R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 14% 98 216 56 144 15.5" 1536 793 LGD0625
Typical Alpha NH58JNP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Metabox Alpha NH58JNP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback