Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 324%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 394%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 125%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics270% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 02:38
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$314
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 221
2-Core 443
128% 249 Pts
4-Core 884
8-Core 1,735
155% 1,310 Pts
64-Core 3,184
197% 3,184 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 125%
Great: 131%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4577
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 12.1
9% 12.8 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 0.1
4% 6.23 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 10%
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
270% Outstanding
Lighting 353
Reflection 482
Parallax 818
288% 551 fps
MRender 523
Gravity 305
Splatting 475
358% 434 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 270%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2666 2730 2765 2756 2759 1579 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2,257
Write 2,682
Mixed 1,711
SusWrite 2,542
519% 2,298 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 310
4K Mixed 56.2
316% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 1,589
DQ Mixed 734
718% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 397%
Great: 394%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: VE0R6364
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 412 411 409 411 411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 408
Mixed 356
SusWrite 411
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 39.2
140% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 207
160% 212 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 117%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: VE0R6364
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 414 415 411 414 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 410
Mixed 372
SusWrite 414
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 39.4
141% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 208
158% 207 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 75.6
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 67.7
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 51.3
SC Mixed 29.3
97% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 180%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ78E5 BenQ GL2580
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback