Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 01:29
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 133
55% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 522
47% 396 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.6% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 54.3
41% 54.6 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 57.5
44% 52.4 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 437
Mixed 416
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 31.6
107% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 306
225% 293 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
483GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 193
Write 171
Mixed 86.1
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SMI USB DISK 64GB
56GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 9.5
Mixed 17.6
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
60% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 41%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6
1GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 4.2
13% 13 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 200 38 60 21.5" 1280 720 LEN60A2 LEN LT2223zwC
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback