Bosgame H68

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBosgame H68  (all builds)
MotherboardBosgame Bosgame
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 01:15
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 256
81% 152 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 636
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 29.7
16% 27.6 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 25.4
17% 19.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0 512GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM01100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1153 1236 915 69 52 554 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,839
Write 1,240
Mixed 1176
SusWrite 663
274% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 34.1
152% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 444
380% 544 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 186%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40S5.M4A1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 35.4
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 0.7" 1280 720 PHL0000 Philips FTV
Typical H68 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Bosgame H68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback