Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 22:45
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 98.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 311
105% 190 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,135
104% 874 Pts
64-Core 1,517
94% 1,517 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 436 356 464 224 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 729
Mixed 179
SusWrite 321
81% 355 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.5
191% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 742
556% 737 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 119%
Great: 226%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
560GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1670 1394 1206 1143 1130 1113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,409
Write 1,820
Mixed 1,719
SusWrite 1,276
404% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 69.7
224% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 1,174
882% 1,181 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 297%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 46.9
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 34.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 43.4
100% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 40.7
98% 40.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 123%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 0P 5R 10G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 11% 64 69 56 60 0" 1280 720
History: Score 19: 0P 3R 0G 4B | Score 63: 0P 5R 10G 8B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback