Lenovo 83AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemLenovo 83AX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231228
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 64.7
1-Core 168
2-Core 329
97% 187 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,102
106% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,284
80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 680M
Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.10.24.02
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 78
35% 57.2 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 26
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51010A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 776 801 816 830 899 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,902
Write 1,660
Mixed 889
SusWrite 862
348% 1,578 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 48.3
159% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 872
564% 673 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 244%
Great: 467%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 40.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 41% 17 216 57 90 14.5" 1280 720 LEN89C1
Typical 83AX Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback