Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA607PI_FA607PI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA607PI_FA607PI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA607PI
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 21:34
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 194
2-Core 387
114% 220 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,463
130% 1,104 Pts
64-Core 2,508
155% 2,508 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Asus(1043 3628) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.38.09
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW 1TB
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KXJ72W1Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,614
Write 2,211
Mixed 1,837
424% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 54.8
176% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1159
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 747
555% 757 MB/s
Poor: 213% Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
121% Outstanding
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 39.4
121% 42.4 GB/s
SC Read 44.6
SC Write 52.6
SC Mixed 38
129% 45.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 121%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 216 57 165 16" 1280 720 AUO75AC B160QAN02.7
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback