MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 20:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 908
98% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 256
Parallax 280
225% 271 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 227
Splatting 170
185% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 64 27 26 239 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,354
Write 113
Mixed 225
SusWrite 138
98% 458 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 54.7
181% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 121
160% 307 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 137%
Great: 295%
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148
410GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 47 48 47 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 113%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
450GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 3.4 4.9 5 6.3 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 47%
Intenso External USB 3.0 750GB
103GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 60 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 94.6
Write 98.8
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 61.1
94% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 39.5
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 41
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 167 27.6" 1280 720 ACR0804 ED270R P
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 5,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback