TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 20:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 975
89% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,475
91% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 90.5%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.5
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.57%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
531GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 452 105 178 104 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 1,428
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 205
230% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 67.6
232% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 271
330% 571 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑
This bench: 174%
 Great: 255%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 187 191 189 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 88.2
Write 146
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 189
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 80%
 Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.6% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.1
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 63.6%
 Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix MAG27CQ
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples5,584x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples5,308x
Core i7-8700KIntel  $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples1,382x
GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples1,526x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,335x
RTX 2080Nvidia  $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples1,138x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,367x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples1,060x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples813x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples749x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples593x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples531x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback