Zoostorm 7876-0232A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 2 months ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago.

System	Zoostorm 7876-0232A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '24 at 20:11
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 133 2-Core 250 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 718 72% 583 Pts	64-Core 719 44% 719 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.7% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 130 Parallax 120 93% 121 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 124 Splatting 110 90% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR022 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 499 Write 416 Mixed 392 97% 436 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 46.9 154% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 305 243% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 384GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 142 Write 113 Mixed 29.8 69% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Mass Storage Device 128GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 112GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 18.1 Write 17.7 Mixed 17.2 23% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.3 219% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GB 6,317 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.9% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 20.6 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 30.1 SC Mixed 22.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	24.1"	1280 720	LEN61B4 LEN T24d-10

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7876-0232A Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 56%

Gunboat

System: Zoostorm 7876-0232A

CPU
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	5x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 78%, 6,317 samples	4x
CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 1x16GBCrucialBench 44%, 651 samples	1x
HX432C16FB/8 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 228 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16