Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 19:59
Run Duration560 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 211
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 497
66% 492 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.3% Poor
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 40.9
34% 42.6 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10604107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 732
Write 702
Mixed 609
152% 681 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 15.5
53% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 382
294% 408 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 267%
Patriot P200 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: S0424A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 314
Write 298
Mixed 234
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 9
56% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 26.6
92% 198 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 94%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 54GB
47GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 570
Write 625
Mixed 546
130% 580 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 15.3
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 186
145% 201 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 100%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 253
Write 179
Mixed 88.8
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 1.8
65% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
3% 7 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 38%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
468GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 161
Write 147
Mixed 78.9
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$37
93GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 256
Write 76.8
Mixed 30.1
114% 121 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 5
316% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 29.7
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 614 169 120 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback