Lenovo 20FES10P00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20FES10P00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FES10P00
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201026
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 19:32
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 137
46% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 203
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2237) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.9
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.4
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000L7 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L6QBXW7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 919
Write 841
Mixed 520
169% 760 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 19.8
77% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 265
204% 280 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 241%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
345GB free
Firmware: 0712
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.2
Write 91
Mixed 62.1
60% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID dd24
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.6
Write 9.7
Mixed 26.2
24% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.3
60% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Chip DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.2
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 48 60 12.5" 1280 720 LEN40E6
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback