Intel NUC11PHBi7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11PHi7
MotherboardIntel NUC11PHBi7  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 214
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 696
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 2090) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 106
Parallax 101
84% 104 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 92.3
Splatting 88.8
78% 96.7 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H10 with SSD 512GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 396 75 96 59 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
OWC Aura P12 Pro 2.0TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 670 644 639 635 639 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 31
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 20.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD
Typical NUC11PHBi7 Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PHBi7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback