Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 18:37
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 686
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 124
Parallax 118
91% 118 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 91.8
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,914
Write 946
Mixed 1,332
308% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 54.8
189% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 720
527% 698 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 261%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
756GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 347 333 335 334 335 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 421
Mixed 407
SusWrite 335
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 50.3
165% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 137%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 15 16 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 LEN66CB L22e-30
Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 4,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback