Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 18:12
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 226
2-Core 444
128% 250 Pts
4-Core 882
8-Core 1,772
156% 1,327 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 122%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1630
Nvidia(10DE 169C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 29.2
27% 30.9 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 29
Splatting 28.8
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,093
Write 1,998
Mixed 1,813
439% 1,968 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 89.5
330% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1301
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,103
839% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
895GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 187
Write 188
Mixed 125
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1.3
50% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 46%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB
191GB free
Firmware: 52020100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 282
Write 67.7
Mixed 61.5
29% 137 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 31.4
103% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 39
DQ Mixed 59.2
75% 143 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
107GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,892
Write 4,024
Mixed 2,954
808% 3,623 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 94
328% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,251
DQ Mixed 1377
1,028% 1,368 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
1TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 91.8
Mixed 76.2
113% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1.1
417% 5.07 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 0.9
407% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 110%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
27GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 53
Write 18.3
Mixed 20.5
32% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.8
109% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 31.7
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 25.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 20% 10 195 57 75 27" 1920 1057 ACR0584 HA270
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 2,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback