MSI MS-17LL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star Alpha 17 B5EEK
MotherboardMSI MS-17LL  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211110
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 17:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 968
87% 731 Pts
64-Core 1138
70% 1138 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
MSI(1462 1314) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 28.9
16% 23.3 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 21.7
17% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,652
Write 1,652
Mixed 1239
338% 1,514 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 69.2
225% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 311
336% 572 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 30.4
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 60 17.2" 1920 1080 CMN176E
Typical MS-17LL Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17LL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback