Megaport MS-7C75

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 days ago, 14 days ago.

System	Megaport MS-7C75 (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C75)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210130
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '24 at 16:33
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 136 2-Core 279 94% 170 Pts	4-Core 549 8-Core 1,034 94% 792 Pts	64-Core 1,452 90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 6527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.1% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 126 Parallax 110 92% 116 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 94.9 Splatting 92.9 86% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 18 188 50 19 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 1,567 Write 256 Mixed 124 SusWrite 62.2 107% 502 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 34.2 114% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 522 DQ Write 59.9 DQ Mixed 81.5 113% 221 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 242%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 592GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 128 132 130 132 130 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 175 Write 179 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 128 92% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 25.8 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 40.6 SC Mixed 24.1 81% 28.2 GB/s	Latency 56.9 70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	22	1	144	27"	1280 720	ACR0767 VG272 P

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7C75 Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 147%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 158%

UFO

System: Megaport MS-7C75

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $440Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	23x
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	14x
Core i7-10700Intel $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	11x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	28x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x

SSD
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	21x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	10x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	29x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	6x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,001

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16