Asus P7P55 LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 LX  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101110
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 15:29
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 152
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 287
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
Asus(1043 038E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.5 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 73 66 76 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 193
Write 128
Mixed 159
SusWrite 73.4
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 23.3
75% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 77.7
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 97.2
75% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 73%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
361GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 88 88 89 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 74.4
Write 73.4
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 88.1
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 111 55 60 27" 1280 720 SAM1044 S27R65x
Typical P7P55 LX Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback