Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-R (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220224
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '24 at 14:52
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 68.9 1-Core 132 2-Core 259 82% 153 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 830 80% 658 Pts	64-Core 940 58% 940 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 36.4 29% 36.8 fps	MRender 36.7 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 26 26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA1a.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 227 234 80 75 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 456 Write 309 Mixed 342 SusWrite 170 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 36.5 138% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 216 185% 270 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.1 4.1 4.1 3.7 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.05% Terrible	Read 13 Write 13.9 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 3.6 14% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 84% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.05% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.8% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 25.5 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 24.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	13	162	2	60	21.5"	1920 1009	IVM560A PLE2208HDS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	89x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $120Bench 72%, 52,721 samples	54x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	102x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	30x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x

RAM
BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 46%, 2,547 samples	20x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	15x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16