Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 14:45
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 887
87% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 203
Parallax 208
102% 179 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 142
Splatting 96.8
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2001T 1TB
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 132 396 385 209 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 503
Write 290
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 200
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
41% 9.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 182 181 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 144
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 182
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 36.2
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 35.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 8% 59 210 56 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F 27GL850
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback