Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 385%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 490%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics310% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 13:56
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$375
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 227
2-Core 453
133% 257 Pts
4-Core 907
8-Core 1,815
160% 1,361 Pts
64-Core 3,763
233% 3,763 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
Asus(1043 8962) ≥ 4GB; ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX4080S-O16G-GAMING
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Lighting 482
Reflection 454
Parallax 523
393% 486 fps
MRender 514
Gravity 386
Splatting 254
300% 385 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 310%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 636 540 538 535 546 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,462
Write 2276
Mixed 2,306
SusWrite 633
430% 1,919 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 92.4
302% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 1,145
DQ Mixed 1,219
923% 1244 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 287%
Great: 421%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 2TB
91GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,164
Write 2,730
Mixed 2,329
541% 2,408 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 63.1
201% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,339
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 608
506% 759 MB/s
Poor: 237% Great: 528%
Nvme Force MP300 480GB
27GB free
Firmware: E8FM11.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 758
Write 765
Mixed 782
172% 768 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 34.8
134% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 664
527% 739 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 170%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
185GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 478 478 478 406 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 469
Mixed 460
SusWrite 431
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
535GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 98 96 96 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 75.5
Write 78
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 97
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
1GB free
Firmware: KC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 100
Mixed 59
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 6000 C30 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
202% Outstanding
MC Read 83
MC Write 79.2
MC Mixed 76.9
228% 79.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 48.2
SC Mixed 37.9
107% 37.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 202%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 144 27" 2048 1089 SAM0F58 C27JG5x
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback